Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
5,039 bytes added ,  15:03, 17 February 2016
added many links and excerpts
-------------------------------------------
In [[sociology]] and [[cultural studies]], '''reappropriation''' or '''reclamation''' is the [[culture|cultural]] process by which a group reclaims—re-[[appropriation (sociology)|appropriates]]—terms or artifacts that were previously used in a way disparaging of that group.<ref name="Slurs">{{cite journal | doi = 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.11.005 | last1 = Croom | first1 = A.M. | year = 2011 | title = Slurs | url = | journal = Language Sciences | volume = 33 | issue = 3| pages = 343–358 }}</ref> For example, since the early 1970s, attempts have been made to reappropriate terminology referring to [[homosexuality]]—such as ''[[gay]]'' and (to a lesser extent) ''[[queer]]'' and ''[[poof]]''. Another example of reappropriation would be an [[African American]] collecting [[lawn jockey]]s or other artifacts of [[darky iconography]]. The term ''reappropriation'' can also extend to counter-[[hegemony|hegemonic]] re-purposing, such as [[citizenship|citizens]] with no formal [[authority#Sociology and philosophy|authority]] seizing unused [[public land|public]] or [[private property|private]] land for community use.
The term ''== TED: Is Reappropriation an Effective Method of Social Change? == http://www.ted.com/conversations/8576/is_reappropriation_an_effectiv.html A.M Croon defines reappropriation'' as "is the cultural process by which a group reclaims—re-appropriates—terms or artifacts that were previously used in a way disparaging of that group" In other words, groups who have suffered under cultural stereotypes or racial/sexist/facist slurs attempt to reclaim the meaning of an extension offensive term to shake the negative associations with it and instead use it as a banner of pride.  One of the most common examples is in the LGBT community. Previously, it was inappropriate to call someone who is gay "queer." However, over time it became the proper moniker to address the community.  Numerous groups have tried to do the same with labels in regards to race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, and politics.  What do you think about activists proactively changing the meaning or association with a word/term ''appropriation'' ? Is the reclanation of offensive epitaphs only symbolic or ''[[cultural appropriation]]'' used does it provide meaningful change for individuals? How does this reverse discourse shape future generations in the way that they of minorities? Can we change the meaning of words/phrases? RELATED TALKS:Mark Pagel: How language transformed humanity http://www.ted.com/talks/mark_pagel_how_language_transformed_humanity      ==THE REAPPROPRIATION OF STIGMATIZING LABELS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL IDENTITY== http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/bodenhausen/reapp.pdf Adam D. Galinsky, Kurt Hugenberg, Carla Groom andGalen Bodenhausen  ABSTRACTWe present a model of reappropriation, the phenomenon whereby a stigmatizedgroup revalues an externally imposed negative label by self-consciouslyreferring to itself in terms of that label. The model specifies the causes andconsequences of reappropriation as well as the essential conditions necessaryfor reappropriation to be effective. To place the concept of reappropriation in [[anthropology]]proper context, [[sociology]] we begin by discussing the roots of stigma and the mediatingrole played by social categorization and social identity in the realization ofstigma’s deleterious effects. We also discuss the strategies available to bothindividuals and groups by which stigmatized individuals can enhance theirdevalued social identities. We provide a discussion of two historical casesof reappropriation and some preliminary empirical evidence concerning theconsequences of self-labeling and [[cultural studies]] attempting to describe reappropriate a stigmatizinglabel. Finally we discuss the reabsorbing implications of [[subculture|subcultural]] styles the model for groups and teams,both within and outside of organizations.  INTRODUCTIONThere is a lot of pain in being a geek. When I first started using the name, it started to fit and formsat the same time empower. Calling myself a geek was saying to all the people who sometimesmade me feel tortured, or isolated, or defeated, “I don’t care if you think I’m a two-headedfreak. I think I’m better than you and smarter than you, and that is all that matters” (RollingStone, April 29, 1999, p. 48   ==The queer state of reappropriation== http://dailycollegian.com/2013/02/28/the-queer-state-of-reappropriation/ The issue isn’t our sexual orientations; it is of those who reclaim words like “faggot,” “bitch,” “queer,” “dyke” and ‘tranny.’ Adam D. Galinsky states that this process of reappropriation can occur when a stigmatized group revalues an externally imposed negative label by self-consciously referring to itself in terms of that label. These group members take insults and then use these terms as positive identifiers. The evolution of the word ‘queer’ sheds light on the process. Queer originally meant “to spoil or ruin,” then developed a negative connotation when referring to gays. Now the word acts as a neutral umbrella term that includes all members of the GLBTQ community. Once divided on the use of this term, the queer community now consistently uses the word with its GLBTQ organizations and Queer Alliances across the country. Compare this development to the reappropriation of “bitch.” The “About Us” section of Bitch Magazine reveals the nature of the reappropriation process.“When it’s being used as an insult, ‘bitch’ is an epithet hurled at women who speak their minds, who have opinions and don’t shy away from other culturesexpressing them, and who don’t sit by and smile uncomfortably if they’re bothered or offended. If being an outspoken woman means being a bitch, into mass culture through we’ll take that as a process compliment,” it states. Some individuals are insulted by these self-proclaimed bitches for speaking their minds and defying gender roles. Reappropriation solves the issue: the editors of the magazine acknowledge their personalities and then own their identities. Their stigmatized characteristics are no longer marks of shame, but ones of pride. The second snippet of commodificationBitch Magazine’s “About Us” reveals the discomfort felt within such a community: “We know that not everyone’s down with the term. Believe us, we’ve heard all about it. But we stand firm in our belief that if we choose to reappropriate the word, it loses its power to hurt us. And if we can get people thinking about what they’re saying when they use the word, that’s even better.”   ==Reappropriate (Grammarist)== http: //grammarist.com/words/reappropriate/ reappropriate is to appropriate something pejorative and make it positive. For example, same gays and lesbians have reappropriated the massslurs fag and dyke (and gay itself is a reappropriation), some people within American hip-hop culture have reappropriated nigga, and tech-savvy sci-marketing fi aficionados have reappropriated the originally pejorative words nerd and geek. Such reappropriated terms are usually best avoided by anyone outside the reappropriating groups, though many reappropriated terms eventually lose their negative connotations and become safe for everyone to use. That has arguably happened with nerd and geek but not the other examples we mentioned. Examples A number of alternate lifestylesSlutWalkers have been adamantly pushing to reappropriate the word slut, practicesor redefine it through repeated use. [Time] That project, however, never came about and artifactsthe money has since been reappropriated to Washington Street. [Peoria Journal Star] It’s enough to make one sentimental for English reappropriation of the “refudiate” kind. [Guardian] The Queer Arts Festival opens Tuesday with an emphasis on reappropriating “queer” so it carries a positive punch.[Vancouver Sun]

Navigation menu