Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
83 bytes added ,  18:41, 5 July 2015
==Prejudice==
<blockquote>
[[Prejudice]] is an irrational feeling of dislike for a person or group of persons, usually based on [[stereotype]].{{citation needed}}
</blockquote>
Racists [[Race realists say|R:]]The feeling of dislike and fear can be perfectly rational. Based on personal experience with [[black crime]] in schools and neighborhoods, reinforced by academic studies about [[race differences (IQ)]], and government statistics about [[race differences (crime)]]. All hinges on the beloved but soundly disproven [[Equality Dogma]]. 
<blockquote>
The feeling Virtually everyone feels some sort of prejudice, whether it's for an ethnic group, or for a religious group, or for a type of dislike and fear can be perfectly rationalperson like blondes or fat people or tall people. Based on personal experience with [[black crime]] The important thing is they just don't like them -- in schools and neighborhoodsshort, reinforced by academic studies about [[race differences(IQ)]]prejudice is a feeling, and government statistics about [[race differences(crime)]]a belief. All hinges You can be prejudiced, but still be a fair person if you're careful not to act on the beloved but soundly disproven your irrational dislike.[[Equality Dogma]http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/07/15/884649/-Why-there-s-no-such-thing-as-Reverse-Racism "Reverse Racism"].
</blockquote>
: Virtually everyone feels some sort ==Discrimination==<blockquote>[[Discrimination]] takes place the moment a person acts on prejudice. This describes those moments when one individual decides not to give another individual a job because of prejudice, whether it's for an ethnic groupsay, their race or for a their religious group, or for a type orientation. Or even because of person like blondes or fat people or tall people. The important thing is they just dontheir looks (there't like them -- in short, prejudice is s a feelinglot of hiring discrimination against "unattractive" women, a belieffor example). You can be prejudiceddiscriminate, but still be a fair individually, against any person or group, if you're careful not in a position of power over the person you want to act on your irrational dislikediscriminate against.[http://www.dailykosWhite people can discriminate against black people, and black people can discriminate against white people if, for example, one is the interviewer and the other is the person being interviewed.com/story/2010/07/15/884649</-Why-there-s-no-such-thing-as-Reverse-Racism "Reverse Racism"]blockquote>
; Discrimination: [[Discrimination]] takes place the moment a person acts on prejudice. This ==Racism==<blockquote>Racism describes those moments when one individual decides not to give another individual a job because patterns of, say, their race or their religious orientationdiscrimination that are institutionalized as "normal" throughout an entire culture. Or even because of their looks (thereIt's a lot of hiring discrimination against based on an ideological belief that one "race" is somehow better than another "unattractiverace" women, for example). You can discriminate, individually, against any It's not one person or groupdiscriminating at this point, if you're but a whole population operating in a position of power over the social structure that actually makes it difficult for a person you want not to discriminate against. White people can discriminate against black people, and black people can discriminate against white people if, for example, one is the interviewer and the other is the person being interviewed.
A clear cut example is a slave-holding culture: people are born into a society where one sort of person is "naturally" a master, and another sort of person is "naturally" a slave (and sometimes not considered a person at all, but a beast of burden). In a culture like that, discrimination is built into the social, economic and political fabric, and individuals -- even "free" individuals -- don't really have a choice about whether they discriminate or not because even if they don't believe in slavery, they interact every day with slaves and the laws and rules that keep slaves bound. [http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/07/15/884649/-Why-there-s-no-such-thing-as-Reverse-Racism "Reverse Racism"]
;'''Racism''':If you look at important voting bodies like the Federal and the State senates and congresses, howeveror at the Federal and State supreme courts, describes patterns or at the CEO list of discrimination major corporations, or at any other body that are institutionalized as "normal" throughout an entire culturewields substantial power in the U. It's based on an ideological belief that one "race" is somehow better than another "race"S. It's not one person discriminating at this point, but you will count only a whole population operating few black faces (and in a social structure that actually makes it difficult for a person not to discriminatesome cases, none). </blockquote>
Racists say:
This is due to [[Race difference (IQ)]]. [[IQ]] is the most important predictor or professional success. Race differences in Self Control, capacity to defer gratification, discipline also contribute to that difference in professional success. Due to [[Jewish Intelligence]] over 30% of non-peace Nobel Prizes have been bestowed upon Jews, who are only 0.2% of the world's population (citation needed). Say Racists.
A clear cut example is a slave-holding culture: people are born into a society where one sort <blockquote>Out of the number of person is "naturally" a masterblack faces you count, and another sort most of person is "naturally" a slave (and sometimes them will not considered a person at all, but a beast be representing the views of burden). In a culture like that, discrimination is built into the social, economic and political fabric, and individuals -- even "free" individuals -- don't really have a choice about whether they discriminate or not because even if they don't believe majority of black people in slaverythis country, they interact every day with slaves and but the views of the laws and rules that keep slaves bound. [http://www.dailykoswhite majority.com/story/2010/07/15/884649</-Why-there-s-no-such-thing-as-Reverse-Racism "Reverse Racism"]blockquote>
Racists say: If you look at important voting bodies like the Federal and the State senates and congresses, or at the Federal and State supreme courts, or at the CEO list of major corporations, or at any other body that wields substantial power in the U.S., you will count only a few black faces (and in some cases, none).
''Racists say: This is due to These Blacks are [[Race difference(IQ)acting White]]. White attitudes of discipline, studiousness, lead to more professional success. They probably have [[IQ]] is similar to the most important predictor or professional successWhites in similar positions. Race differences in Self ControlOr a bit less, capacity to defer gratification, discipline also contribute to that difference in professional successif they got their position by [[affirmative action]] [[quotas]]. Due to Successful Blacks usually are [[Jewish IntelligenceMulattoes]] over 30% of non-peace Nobel Prizes have been bestowed upon Jews, who are only 0.2% of the world's population (citation needed). Say Racists.''
: Out of <blockquote>On the number of black faces other hand, if you count, most of them will not be representing the views of the majority number of black people in this countrypoverty, but and in prisons, or the views number of people who are unemployed or lack health care, there are far more black people in these categories than is proportionate to their numbers in the white majoritylarger society. </blockquote>
''Racists say: These Blacks are [[acting White]]. White attitudes of discipline, studiousness, lead to more professional success. They probably have [[IQ]] similar to the Whites in similar positions. Or a bit less, if they got their position by [[affirmative action]] [[quotas]]. Successful Blacks usually are [[Mulattoes]].''
: On the other hand, if you count the number of black people in poverty, It is uncontested that Blacks commit more crime and have lower education. Due to scientifically proven [[race differences (IQ)]] and in prisons, or the number of people who are unemployed or lack health care[[race differences (crime)]], there are far more black people in these categories than is proportionate to their proportionally large numbers of Blacks in the larger societylow IQ and high crime populations.[[Black Crime|high criminality]]
''Racists say: It is uncontested </blockquote>Unless you are going to argue that Blacks commit more crime and have lower education. Due blacks are "naturally" inferior to scientifically proven [[race differenceswhites (IQ)]] and [[race differences(crimewhich is an outright racist position)]], there are proportionally large numbers of Blacks in the low IQ and high crime populations. [[Black Crime | high criminality]]''</blockquote>
Racists say: Unless you are going to argue that blacks are Blacks have lower [[IQ]], and [[Black Crime|higher criminality]]. That is as "inferior" as white "naturally[[inferiority]]" inferior to whites (which is an outright racist position), in the Olympic [[100 meter race]].</blockquote>
<blockquote>
You have to admit that there is some mechanism that is limiting black opportunity.
</blockquote>
''Racists say: Blacks have lower Low [[IQ]], and low [[Black Crime |higher criminalityself control]]are some of these mechanisms. That is as "inferior" as white "[[inferiority]]" in the Olympic [[100 meter race]].''
: you </blockquote>That's the mechanism we call "racism" -- the interacting social, political, and economic rule systems that all discriminate, either overtly ([[racial profiling]], for example) or covertly (i.e., white majority governments redrawing district voting lines so that black majority areas are politically split up and don't have the electoral power to admit that there is some mechanism that is limiting vote in black opportunity. candidates; </blockquote>
''Racists say:Blacks voting for Blacks because of the color of their skin in [IQ[Black racism], low [self control]. But as is explained here, are some of these mechanisms, say Racists''Blacks can not be racist.
<blockquote>
or, white-run banks using zip codes as a criteria for excluding people who apply for loans. These are scientifically developed criteria to discern who can pay back the loan. The world wide [[pc:subprime mortgage crisis]] was actually caused by the non-performing loans that Banks had to give to minorities that did not qualify for loans, and just "happening" to exclude all the majority black neighborhoods in a city, a practice called "red-lining"). One could go on for hours about these various mechanisms, and I'm sure you can think of plenty on your own which discriminate against blacks, Hispanics, "Arab-looking" people, Native Americans, and so on.
</blockquote>
==Reverse Racism==
[http: That//www.dailykos.com/story/2010/07/15/884649/-Why-there-s-no-such-thing-as-Reverse-Racism Why there's the mechanism we call no such thing as "racismReverse Racism" -- the interacting social, political, and economic rule systems that all discriminate, either overtly ([[racial profiling]], for example) or covertly (i.e., white majority governments redrawing district voting lines so that black majority areas are politically split up and don't have the electoral power to vote in black candidates;
''Racists would say: Blacks voting for Blacks because of the color of their skin in [[Black racism]]. But as is explained here, Blacks can not be racist. ''<blockquote>
: orTo '''Reverse Racism''' it's crucial to maintain the distinction between the above three terms, because otherwise white-run banks using zip codes people tend to redefine "Discrimination" as a criteria for excluding "Racism". Their main argument is that because both blacks and white can discriminate against each other, that "Reverse Racism" is possible. But the truth of the matter is that black people who apply for loans: 1) have far less opportunity to discriminate against whites than whites have to discriminate against blacks,overall; and 2) black people lack a system of institutionalized support that protect them when they discriminate against whites. [...]
''these are scientifically developed criteria to discern who can pay back Reverse Racism would only describe a society in which all the rules and roles were turned upside down. That has not happened in the loanU. The world wide [[pc:subprime mortgage crisis]] was actually caused S., however much white right wing ideologues want to complain that they're being victimized by the non-performing loans few points of equality that Banks had minorities and women have managed to claim. White people who complain about "Reverse Racism" are actually complaining about being denied their privileges, rather than being denied their rights. They feel entitled to give be hired and not to minorities be discriminated against, even though the norm is white people discriminating against blacks. If, in a rare instance, a black employer discriminates against a white job applicant, that did 's not qualify for loans"reverse" anything -- it's simple discrimination.It's to be condemned on principle, but it's not evidence of some systematic program by which whites are being deprived of their rights.
: and just "happening" to exclude all the majority black neighborhoods in a city, a practice called "red-lining"). One could go on for hours about these various mechanisms, and I'm sure you can think of plenty on your own which discriminate against blacks, Hispanics, "Arab-looking" people, Native Americans, & so on. [http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/07/15/884649/-Why-there-s-no-such-thing-as-Reverse-Racism Why there's no such thing as "Reverse Racism"]==[http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/07/15/884649/-Why-there-s-no-such-thing-as-Reverse-Racism Why there's no such thing as "Reverse Racism"]==    :Reverse Racism: Now to '''"Reverse Racism."''' It's crucial to maintain the distinction between the above three terms, because otherwise white people tend to redefine "Discrimination" as "Racism". Their main argument is that because both blacks and white can discriminate against each other, that "Reverse Racism" is possible. But the truth of the matter is that black people: 1) have far less opportunity to discriminate against whites than whites have to discriminate against blacks, overall; and 2) black people lack a system of institutionalized support that protect them when they discriminate against whites. [...] : "Reverse Racism" would only describe a society in which all the rules and roles were turned upside down. That has not happened in the U.S., however much white right wing ideologues want to complain that they're being victimized by the few points of equality that minorities and women have managed to claim. White people who complain about "Reverse Racism" are actually complaining about being denied their privileges, rather than being denied their rights. They feel entitled to be hired and not to be discriminated against, even though the norm is white people discriminating against blacks. If, in a rare instance, a black employer discriminates against a white job applicant, that's not "reverse" anything -- it's simple discrimination. It's to be condemned on principle, but it's not evidence of some systematic program by which whites are being deprived of their rights.  : The right wing popularized the term "Reverse Racism" because they were really angry at having their white privileges challenged. Anyone who uses that phrase, whether they are right wing or not, furthers the right wing's cause. This is what I tell Democrats and progressives who I hear using the term -- not only are they being inaccurate, but they're helping out their opponents. : The above arguments can be applied to any institutionalized structure of oppression, affecting any race, ethnic or religious group, and can be used to to oppose claims of "Reverse Sexism" too.
The above arguments can be applied to any institutionalized structure of oppression, affecting any race, ethnic or religious group, and can be used to to oppose claims of "Reverse Sexism" too.
</blockquote>
==Further Definitions==
Further Definitions[[Category:Under construction]]
autoreview, Bureaucrats, editor, reviewer, Administrators
295

edits

Navigation menu