Reappropriation
In sociology and cultural studies, reappropriation or reclamation is the cultural process by which a group reclaims—re-appropriates—terms or artifacts that were previously used in a way disparaging of that group.[1] For example, since the early 1970s, attempts have been made to reappropriate terminology referring to homosexuality—such as gay and (to a lesser extent) queer and poof. Another example of reappropriation would be an African American collecting lawn jockeys or other artifacts of darky iconography. The term reappropriation can also extend to counter-hegemonic re-purposing, such as citizens with no formal authority seizing unused public or private land for community use.
The term reappropriation is an extension of the term appropriation or cultural appropriation used in anthropology, sociology and cultural studies to describe the reabsorbing of subcultural styles and forms, or those from other cultures, into mass culture through a process of commodification: the mass-marketing of alternate lifestyles, practices, and artifacts. Wikipedia
R: Even among Race Realists or Racists very few dare to propose to proudly reappropriate the word "Racism". The N-word seemingly was reappropriated by Blacks and rappers, while still taboo for Whites to utter.
Contents
TED: Is Reappropriation an Effective Method of Social Change?
http://www.ted.com/conversations/8576/is_reappropriation_an_effectiv.html
A.M Croon defines reappropriation as "is the cultural process by which a group reclaims—re-appropriates—terms or artifacts that were previously used in a way disparaging of that group" In other words, groups who have suffered under cultural stereotypes or racial/sexist/facist slurs attempt to reclaim the meaning of an offensive term to shake the negative associations with it and instead use it as a banner of pride.
One of the most common examples is in the LGBT community. Previously, it was inappropriate to call someone who is gay "queer." However, over time it became the proper moniker to address the community.
Numerous groups have tried to do the same with labels in regards to race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, and politics.
What do you think about activists proactively changing the meaning or association with a word/term? Is the reclanation of offensive epitaphs only symbolic or does it provide meaningful change for individuals? How does this reverse discourse shape future generations in the way that they of minorities? Can we change the meaning of words/phrases?
RELATED TALKS: Mark Pagel: How language transformed humanity
http://www.ted.com/talks/mark_pagel_how_language_transformed_humanity
THE REAPPROPRIATION OF STIGMATIZING LABELS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL IDENTITY
http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/bodenhausen/reapp.pdf
Adam D. Galinsky, Kurt Hugenberg, Carla Groom and Galen Bodenhausen
ABSTRACT
We present a model of reappropriation, the phenomenon whereby a stigmatized
group revalues an externally imposed negative label by self-consciously
referring to itself in terms of that label. The model specifies the causes and
consequences of reappropriation as well as the essential conditions necessary
for reappropriation to be effective. To place the concept of reappropriation in
proper context, we begin by discussing the roots of stigma and the mediating
role played by social categorization and social identity in the realization of
stigma’s deleterious effects. We also discuss the strategies available to both
individuals and groups by which stigmatized individuals can enhance their
devalued social identities. We provide a discussion of two historical cases
of reappropriation and some preliminary empirical evidence concerning the
consequences of self-labeling and attempting to reappropriate a stigmatizing
label. Finally we discuss the implications of the model for groups and teams,
both within and outside of organizations.
INTRODUCTION
There is a lot of pain in being a geek. When I first started using the name, it started to fit and
at the same time empower. Calling myself a geek was saying to all the people who sometimes
made me feel tortured, or isolated, or defeated, “I don’t care if you think I’m a two-headed
freak. I think I’m better than you and smarter than you, and that is all that matters” (Rolling
Stone, April 29, 1999, p. 48
The queer state of reappropriation
http://dailycollegian.com/2013/02/28/the-queer-state-of-reappropriation/
The issue isn’t our sexual orientations; it is of those who reclaim words like “faggot,” “bitch,” “queer,” “dyke” and ‘tranny.’ Adam D. Galinsky states that this process of reappropriation can occur when a stigmatized group revalues an externally imposed negative label by self-consciously referring to itself in terms of that label. These group members take insults and then use these terms as positive identifiers. The evolution of the word ‘queer’ sheds light on the process. Queer originally meant “to spoil or ruin,” then developed a negative connotation when referring to gays. Now the word acts as a neutral umbrella term that includes all members of the GLBTQ community. Once divided on the use of this term, the queer community now consistently uses the word with its GLBTQ organizations and Queer Alliances across the country.
Compare this development to the reappropriation of “bitch.” The “About Us” section of Bitch Magazine reveals the nature of the reappropriation process. “When it’s being used as an insult, ‘bitch’ is an epithet hurled at women who speak their minds, who have opinions and don’t shy away from expressing them, and who don’t sit by and smile uncomfortably if they’re bothered or offended. If being an outspoken woman means being a bitch, we’ll take that as a compliment,” it states.
Some individuals are insulted by these self-proclaimed bitches for speaking their minds and defying gender roles. Reappropriation solves the issue: the editors of the magazine acknowledge their personalities and then own their identities. Their stigmatized characteristics are no longer marks of shame, but ones of pride.
The second snippet of Bitch Magazine’s “About Us” reveals the discomfort felt within such a community:
“We know that not everyone’s down with the term. Believe us, we’ve heard all about it. But we stand firm in our belief that if we choose to reappropriate the word, it loses its power to hurt us. And if we can get people thinking about what they’re saying when they use the word, that’s even better.”
Reappropriate (Grammarist)
http://grammarist.com/words/reappropriate/
reappropriate is to appropriate something pejorative and make it positive. For example, same gays and lesbians have reappropriated the slurs fag and dyke (and gay itself is a reappropriation), some people within American hip-hop culture have reappropriated nigga, and tech-savvy sci-fi aficionados have reappropriated the originally pejorative words nerd and geek.
Such reappropriated terms are usually best avoided by anyone outside the reappropriating groups, though many reappropriated terms eventually lose their negative connotations and become safe for everyone to use. That has arguably happened with nerd and geek but not the other examples we mentioned.
Examples
A number of SlutWalkers have been adamantly pushing to reappropriate the word slut, or redefine it through repeated use. [Time]
That project, however, never came about and the money has since been reappropriated to Washington Street. [Peoria Journal Star]
It’s enough to make one sentimental for English reappropriation of the “refudiate” kind. [Guardian]
The Queer Arts Festival opens Tuesday with an emphasis on reappropriating “queer” so it carries a positive punch. [Vancouver Sun]