Difference between revisions of "Racist babies/doll studies"

From Racism wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
test
+
Doll studies (baby racism)
 +
[http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/05/13/doll.study/ Study: White and black children biased toward lighter skin]
 +
<ref name="cnnblackbias"> [http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/05/13/doll.study/ Study: White and black children biased toward lighter skin] </ref>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<blockquote> The Clarks asked black children to choose between a white doll and -- because at the time, no brown dolls were available -- a white doll painted brown. They asked black children a series of questions and found they overwhelmingly preferred white over brown. '''The study and its conclusions were used in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case, which led to the desegregation of American schools.'''�</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
[Racists say |R: ]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[...]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
In the new study, Spencer's researchers asked the younger children a series of questions and had them answer by pointing to one of five cartoon pictures that varied in skin color from light to dark. The older children were asked the same questions using the same cartoon pictures, and were then asked a series of questions about a color bar chart that showed light to dark skin tones.
 +
The tests showed that white children, as a whole, responded with a high rate of what researchers call "white bias," identifying the color of their own skin with positive attributes and darker skin with negative attributes. Spencer said even black children, as a whole, have some bias toward whiteness, but far less than white children.
 +
 
 +
"All kids on the one hand are exposed to the stereotypes" she said. "What's really significant here is that white children are learning or maintaining those stereotypes much more strongly than the African-American children. Therefore, the white youngsters are even more stereotypic in their responses concerning attitudes, beliefs and attitudes and preferences than the African-American children."
 +
Spencer says this may be happening because "parents of color in particular had the extra burden of helping to function as an interpretative wedge for their children. Parents have to reframe what children experience ... and the fact that white children and families don't have to engage in that level of parenting, I think, does suggest a level of entitlement. You can spend more time on spelling, math and reading, because you don't have that extra task of basically reframing messages that children get from society."
 +
 
 +
iReport: Where do we go from here?
 +
 
 +
Spencer was also surprised that children's ideas about race, for the most part, don't evolve as they get older. The study showed that children's ideas about race change little from age 5 to age 10.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
Sure children do evolve with age. You should know that if you are you a PhD in Psychology.
 +
<blockquote>
 +
"The fact that there were no differences between younger children, who are very spontaneous because of where they are developmentally, versus older children, who are more thoughtful, given where they are in their thinking, I was a little surprised that we did not find differences."
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
[Racists say |R: ] [[Racism is right]] This could perfectly be true to experiencing [[black misbehavior]] and [[black crime]]. There is [[outgroup bias]]. Blacks children's life experience seems to overcome this outgroup bias, Black children probably notice that whites are better behaved. [[Jesse Jackson fears Blacks]] when followed on a dark street.  Many adult [[Blacks prefer white ]] Neighborhoods, white schools, and white Universities.
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Spencer said the study points to major trends but is not the definitive word on children and race. It does lead her to conclude that even in 2010, "we are still living in a society where ''' dark things are devalued and white things are valued''' ."
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
Scientific researchers spewing nonsense.  Do they [[brainwash]] the public on purpose, or are they so [[brainwash]]ed themselves that they believe that? 
 +
As quoted above, this experiment and its wrong interpretation led to [[school integration]]  [[busing]]. [Racists say |R: ] this led to inumerous traumatized white children, bused into ghetto schools, some bullied, raped, killed. [needs citation]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Let me suggest a few psychological tests to check if children prefer white iphones and dresses, if babies prefer pale blondes to suntanned brunettes. Details here
 +
<ref name="psychtest1"> 
 +
# People prefer white things? Let us test preference for black vs. white computers, iphones, suits.
 +
# In a white only environment, let us compare suntanned whites vs white skin whites. Will there be a prejudice that dark tanned white children prefer pale white children?
 +
# Compare pale blonde whites and somewhat darker Japanese, Koreans, who have lower criminality, better behavior than whites. Will Koreans prefer pale white dolls?
 +
# Let us create an environment for children where whites are violent, rowdy, [[black misbehavior | misbehave], and Blacks are more intelligent, have more [[self control]]. It is likely that no such environment exists anywhere in the word.  Children of the black elite suffer from [[regression towards the mean]]. [Racists say |R: ] Because of this [[regression towards the mean]], black children, on average, are less intelligent and less well behaved than their exceptional parents.  </ref>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Po Bronson, author of NurtureShock and an award-winning writer on parenting issues says white parents "want to give their kids this sort of post-racial future when they're very young and they're under the wrong conclusion that their kids are colorblind. ... It's in the absence of messages of tolerance that they will naturally ... develop these skin preferences."
 +
Many African-American parents CNN spoke to during the study say they begin discussing race at a very early age because they say they feel they have to prepare their children for a society where their skin color will create obstacles for them. <ref name="cnndolltest"> [http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/05/18/doll.study.parents/  Kids' test answers on race brings mother to tears ] </ref>
 +
 
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
P

Revision as of 22:02, 8 July 2015

Doll studies (baby racism) Study: White and black children biased toward lighter skin [1]


The Clarks asked black children to choose between a white doll and -- because at the time, no brown dolls were available -- a white doll painted brown. They asked black children a series of questions and found they overwhelmingly preferred white over brown. The study and its conclusions were used in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case, which led to the desegregation of American schools.

[Racists say |R: ]


[...]


In the new study, Spencer's researchers asked the younger children a series of questions and had them answer by pointing to one of five cartoon pictures that varied in skin color from light to dark. The older children were asked the same questions using the same cartoon pictures, and were then asked a series of questions about a color bar chart that showed light to dark skin tones. The tests showed that white children, as a whole, responded with a high rate of what researchers call "white bias," identifying the color of their own skin with positive attributes and darker skin with negative attributes. Spencer said even black children, as a whole, have some bias toward whiteness, but far less than white children.

"All kids on the one hand are exposed to the stereotypes" she said. "What's really significant here is that white children are learning or maintaining those stereotypes much more strongly than the African-American children. Therefore, the white youngsters are even more stereotypic in their responses concerning attitudes, beliefs and attitudes and preferences than the African-American children." Spencer says this may be happening because "parents of color in particular had the extra burden of helping to function as an interpretative wedge for their children. Parents have to reframe what children experience ... and the fact that white children and families don't have to engage in that level of parenting, I think, does suggest a level of entitlement. You can spend more time on spelling, math and reading, because you don't have that extra task of basically reframing messages that children get from society."

iReport: Where do we go from here?

Spencer was also surprised that children's ideas about race, for the most part, don't evolve as they get older. The study showed that children's ideas about race change little from age 5 to age 10.

Sure children do evolve with age. You should know that if you are you a PhD in Psychology.

"The fact that there were no differences between younger children, who are very spontaneous because of where they are developmentally, versus older children, who are more thoughtful, given where they are in their thinking, I was a little surprised that we did not find differences."

[Racists say |R: ] Racism is right This could perfectly be true to experiencing black misbehavior and black crime. There is outgroup bias. Blacks children's life experience seems to overcome this outgroup bias, Black children probably notice that whites are better behaved. Jesse Jackson fears Blacks when followed on a dark street. Many adult Blacks prefer white Neighborhoods, white schools, and white Universities.

Spencer said the study points to major trends but is not the definitive word on children and race. It does lead her to conclude that even in 2010, "we are still living in a society where dark things are devalued and white things are valued ."

Scientific researchers spewing nonsense. Do they brainwash the public on purpose, or are they so brainwashed themselves that they believe that? As quoted above, this experiment and its wrong interpretation led to school integration busing. [Racists say |R: ] this led to inumerous traumatized white children, bused into ghetto schools, some bullied, raped, killed. [needs citation]


Let me suggest a few psychological tests to check if children prefer white iphones and dresses, if babies prefer pale blondes to suntanned brunettes. Details here [2]


Po Bronson, author of NurtureShock and an award-winning writer on parenting issues says white parents "want to give their kids this sort of post-racial future when they're very young and they're under the wrong conclusion that their kids are colorblind. ... It's in the absence of messages of tolerance that they will naturally ... develop these skin preferences." Many African-American parents CNN spoke to during the study say they begin discussing race at a very early age because they say they feel they have to prepare their children for a society where their skin color will create obstacles for them. [3]



P

  1. Study: White and black children biased toward lighter skin
    1. People prefer white things? Let us test preference for black vs. white computers, iphones, suits.
    2. In a white only environment, let us compare suntanned whites vs white skin whites. Will there be a prejudice that dark tanned white children prefer pale white children?
    3. Compare pale blonde whites and somewhat darker Japanese, Koreans, who have lower criminality, better behavior than whites. Will Koreans prefer pale white dolls?
    4. Let us create an environment for children where whites are violent, rowdy, [[black misbehavior | misbehave], and Blacks are more intelligent, have more self control. It is likely that no such environment exists anywhere in the word. Children of the black elite suffer from regression towards the mean. [Racists say |R: ] Because of this regression towards the mean, black children, on average, are less intelligent and less well behaved than their exceptional parents.
  2. Kids' test answers on race brings mother to tears